Office of the Child Advocate
At a Glance
JEANNE MILSTEIN, Child Advocate
Mickey Kramer, Associate Child Advocate
Julie McKenna, Assistant Child Advocate
Moira O’Neill, Assistant Child Advocate
Heather Panciera, Assistant Child Advocate
Faith Vos Winkel, Assistant Child Advocate
Denise Scruggs, Administrative Assistant
Janet Santiago, Processing Tech
Established
– 1995
Statutory authority
– CGS §46a-13k, et seq.
Central office
- 18-20 Trinity Street, 5th floor,
Hartford, CT 06106
Number of employees
- 8
Recurring operating expenses
– $693,343
The Office of the Child Advocate (OCA) speaks for Connecticut’s children. The OCA was created in 1995 to be an independent voice for children rather than an administrator of programs. OCA’s mission is to oversee the care and protection of Connecticut’s children and to advocate for their well-being. OCA is committed to ensuring that all children receive the care and supports they need.
Statutory Responsibility
The statutory responsibilities include
evaluating the procedures for and the delivery of state-funded services to
children; investigating inquiries or complaints regarding children;
recommending changes in state policy; conducting programs of public education;
legislative advocacy and proposing systemic reform; reviewing conditions and
procedures of all public and private facilities where children are placed;
providing training and technical assistance to children’s attorneys; initiating
or intervening in court cases on behalf of children; serving on the Child
Fatality Review Panel and conducting a fatality review on the circumstances of
the death of a child due to unexpected or unexplained causes and to facilitate
development of prevention strategies to address identified trends and patterns
of risk and to improve coordination of services for children and families in
the state.
During its eight-year history, OCA has
brought about significant change for Connecticut families and children. OCA helps families by educating and
informing them about services for children, coaching them through various
public systems, reviewing individual cases, advocating for children at risk,
and addressing broad public policy issues.
These reviews and investigations not only help the OCA address individual
problems, but also assist the OCA in identifying the systems issues that need
to be addressed. The activities of the
OCA benefit the children of this state, and serve as a catalyst for policy and
legislative change.
The OCA responded to a record number of
citizen inquiries and complaints, and we assisted a record number of citizens
and providers to navigate government and other public agencies and social
service systems. This is particularly
useful for the growing number of situations referred to OCA that involve
children with complex needs who require support and assistance from multiple
agencies and professional disciplines.
In addition, a case management system has been developed to document
calls and activities. In the future the
agency will be able to identify system trends and issues that can in turn serve
as a catalyst for policy and legislative improvements.
The tragic deaths of six and a half-month
infant Ezramicah H., and 12-year-old Joseph Daniel S. reminded us of the
vulnerability of children served by the child protection system. The Office of the Child Advocate and the
Child Fatality Review Panel investigated and released in-depth reports on two
child fatalities and reviewed approximately 15 child fatalities per month. This attention to, and investigation of,
situations where the actions or inactions of agencies may have played a
relevant role with a particular child and/or family has helped prevent future
tragedy by identifying risks to children and advocating for specific system
changes and prevention strategies.
One of OCA’s primary goals in accordance
with CT Gen. Stat. §46a- was to review and monitor those facilities where
children are placed. OCA assesses the
appropriateness, safety and quality of supports and services to children in
congregate care settings. OCA was
compelled to spend several months investigating and monitoring the new
Connecticut Juvenile Training School for boys due to the severity of
allegations and findings of program, treatment and safety deficiencies. In addition, we have addressed the chaos
created by the premature closure of Long Lane School, Connecticut’s only public
facility for adjudicated delinquent girls.
The Office of the Child Advocate is
committed to regular reviews of its current operating procedures aimed at
reducing waste and increasing efficiency.
The OCA has implemented operating policies and procedures and has
computerized office operations. There
is more reliance on email than regular mail in an effort to reduce waste of
paper.
Strategic Planning
The
Child Advocate named the following priorities for the next fiscal year:
·
Initiate
legal action in appropriate cases.
·
Review
and monitor children's facilities to assess the appropriateness and quality of
supports and services to children in congregate care settings.
·
Educate
the public on children's issues and OCA's work.
·
Develop
and implement strategies to improve the system on the basis of citizens'
concerns as voiced in calls to OCA.
·
Create
a report that shows trends through information that is gained through the new
ombudsman system.
·
Enhance
capacity of facility review mandates of the OCA by hiring an individual for the
newly created facility review position.
·
Determine
the appropriateness of quality of supports/services offered to children in
congregate settings.
Information Reported as Required by State
Statute
The Office of the Child Advocate has
developed an affirmative action plan which complies with Connecticut General
Statutes § 46a-70 through 46a-78.
As mandated by Conn. Gen. Stat. §§
46a-13k(f) and 46a-13q(a), the Office of the Child Advocate submitted an annual
report for the period of July 1, 2002 through June 30, 2003.